



Industry-leading capabilities for female reproductive health research.

Clinically Relevant Models
Our preclinical models recapitulate key pathological features of reproductive and metabolic disorders, enabling translational evaluation of clinically relevant endpoints. PMOS models capture the interplay between reproductive dysfunction and metabolic complications, including insulin resistance, impaired glucose homeostasis, dyslipidemia, and obesity-related phenotypes. Endometriosis models reproduce lesion progression and pain-associated features to support therapeutic evaluation.
01

Multi-Dimensional Disease Phenotyping
Comprehensive phenotyping integrates reproductive, metabolic, pathological, and behavioral assessments, including hormone profiling, ovarian function, glucose and lipid metabolism, body composition, lesion development, and pain-related behaviors, providing clinically aligned efficacy readouts.
02

Translational Drug Discovery Support
Validated efficacy workflows benchmark emerging therapies against clinically relevant endpoints, supporting translational development of novel treatments for PMOS, endometriosis, and metabolic complications associated with female reproductive disorders. Evaluation focuses on clinically meaningful outcomes, including improvement of insulin sensitivity, glucose and lipid metabolism, obesity-related phenotypes, reproductive function restoration, lesion control, and pain relief.
03
Comprehensive PMOS and Endometriosis models for preclinical research

Ovarian and uterine weights were assessed in female B6 and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice at 12 and 16 weeks of age without any additional experimental induction. BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice exhibited significantly reduced ovarian and uterine weights compared with B6 controls, particularly at 16 weeks of age. In contrast, the changes in ovarian and uterine weights in B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice were less pronounced and varied with age.
(A) Ovarian weight and (B) uterine weight in B6 and B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice at 12 and 16 weeks of age. (C) Ovarian weight and (D) uterine weight in B6 and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice at 12 and 16 weeks of age. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001.

Estrous cyclicity was monitored beginning at 8 weeks of age in female mice without any additional experimental induction. Both B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice exhibited profound disruption of estrous cyclicity, with virtually no completed estrous cycles observed during the 10-day monitoring period, in contrast to the regularly cycling B6 controls. Individual stage profiles further demonstrated persistent arrest in diestrus in both mutant strains, indicating spontaneous reproductive cyclicity abnormalities.
(A) Total number of completed estrous cycles in B6 and B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice during the 10-day monitoring period. (B) Representative individual estrous stage profiles in B6 and B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice over 10 consecutive days. (C) Total number of completed estrous cycles in B6 and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice during the 10-day monitoring period. (D) Representative individual estrous stage profiles in B6 and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice over 10 consecutive days. P, proestrus; E, estrus; M, metestrus; D, diestrus. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Representative ovarian histological sections from female B6, B6-Lepr⁻/⁻, and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice at 12 and 16 weeks of age revealed strain-dependent differences in ovarian morphology. B6 control mice displayed corpora lutea (CL), consistent with ongoing ovulatory activity. In contrast, B6-Lepr⁻/⁻ ovaries contained multiple cyst-like follicular structures (asterisks), while BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ ovaries exhibited abnormal ovarian architecture, with cyst-like structures and additional morphological abnormalities (arrows). These findings indicate spontaneous ovarian structural alterations in leptin receptor-deficient mice, with differences between the B6 and BKS genetic backgrounds.
Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained ovarian sections from B6, B6-Lepr⁻/⁻, and BKS-Lepr⁻/⁻ mice at 12 and 16 weeks of age. CL, corpus luteum; asterisks indicate cyst-like follicular structures; arrows indicate regions of abnormal ovarian morphology.

Systemic administration of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) alone or in combination with a high-fat diet (HFD) did not result in significant changes in overall body weight or body weight change rate compared with vehicle-treated control mice throughout the experimental period. However, longitudinal endocrine profiling confirmed that DHEA exposure rapidly driven hyperandrogenemia, as evidenced by markedly elevated serum total testosterone (TP) concentrations across multiple sequential time points (D10, D21, D34, D54, and D68), successfully establishing the characteristic hyperandrogenic endocrine profile of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
(A) Body weight (g) and body weight change relative to baseline (Day 0, %) monitored daily post-dosing; and (B) serum total testosterone (TP) levels measured across multiple time points (D10, D21, D34, D54, D68, and endpoint). Groups were defined as follows: G1 (B6, Vehicle, QD×66, s.c.), G2 (CD:B6, DHEA, 60 mpk, QD×66, s.c.), and G3 (HFD:B6, DHEA, 60 mpk, QD×66, s.c.).
Data presented as Mean±SEM. G1: n=16, G2-G3: n=25. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001 and ****p< 0.0001 by one way ANOVA.

Functional metabolic testing revealed stage-dependent changes in glucose metabolism during PCOS model establishment. In the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the glucose area under the curve (AUC) was significantly increased in both the DHEA+CD and DHEA+HFD groups on Day 26 (D26). By Day 57 (D57), a significant increase in glucose AUC was observed only in the DHEA+HFD group. In the insulin tolerance test (ITT), the blood glucose AUC was significantly increased in both DHEA-treated groups on Day 30 (D30). By Day 64 (D64), the blood glucose AUC remained significantly elevated in the DHEA+CD group, whereas no significant difference was observed between the DHEA+HFD group and the vehicle control group.
(A) OGTT and corresponding glucose area under the curve (AUC) on Day 26 (D26); (B) OGTT and corresponding glucose AUC on Day 57 (D57); (C) ITT and corresponding blood glucose AUC on Day 30 (D30); (D) ITT and corresponding blood glucose AUC on Day 64 (D64). The groups were defined as follows: G1 (B6, vehicle control), G2 (CD:B6, DHEA, 60 mg/kg), and G3 (HFD:B6, DHEA, 60 mg/kg).
Data presented as Mean±SEM. G1: n=16, G2-G3: n=25. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001 and ****p< 0.0001 by one way ANOVA.

Histological examination of ovaries revealed distinct pathological features in DHEA-treated mice, characterized by enlarged and atretic follicles (black arrows), follicular hemorrhage (red arrows), and stromal foam cell accumulation (green arrows). Additionally, gross morphological inspection at endpoint sampling showed marked uterine enlargement and edema in both DHEA+chow diet and DHEA+HFD groups relative to the chow diet control group.
(A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ovarian sections showing enlarged/atretic follicles (black arrows), follicular hemorrhage (red arrows), and accumulation of stromal foam cells (green arrows) (Scale bars: top panels = 500 μm; bottom panels = 100 μm); (B) Gross morphology of representative uteri from chow diet, DHEA+chow diet, and DHEA+HFD groups; (C) H&E staining of ovarian sections displaying follicular development and pathological features across groups (Scale bars: top panels, 500 μm; bottom panels, 100 μm); and (D) Gross appearance of harvested uteri at terminal sampling. Groups were defined as chow diet (Vehicle), DHEA+chow diet (DHEA+CD), and DHEA+HFD.

DHEA administration severely disrupted estrous cyclicity in female mice. The total number of completed estrous cycles was markedly reduced in both DHEA+CD and DHEA+HFD groups during both early (D22–D33) and late (D56–D67) observation windows compared with Vehicle controls. Individual stage heatmaps over a 12-day tracking period (D56–D67) demonstrated persistent acyclicity in DHEA-treated animals, with mice exhibiting continuous arrest primarily in the estrus or diestrus stages.
(A) Total number of estrous cycles during Day 22 to Day 33 (D22–D33); (B) Total number of estrous cycles during Day 56 to Day 67 (D56–D67); and (C) Heatmap representation of daily estrous cycle stages (Proestrus, Estrus, Metestrus, and Diestrus) tracked over a 12-day period (D56–D67) for individual mice in G1 (Vehicle), G2 (DHEA+CD), and G3 (DHEA+HFD). Groups were defined as follows: G1 (B6, Vehicle), G2 (CD:B6, DHEA, 60 mpk), and G3 (HFD:B6, DHEA, 60 mpk). Data presented as Mean±SEM. G1: n=16, G2-G3: n=25. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001 and ****p< 0.0001 by one way ANOVA.
Female SD rats were divided into three groups: sham control, EMT model, and estrogen-supported EMT model. For the EMT model, endometrial tissue was collected during the natural estrus phase, cut into standardized fragments, and surgically transplanted onto the abdominal wall with the endometrial surface exposed to promote ectopic lesion formation. The estrogen-supported EMT group underwent preoperative estrus induction and received postoperative estrogen administration (Q2W). Sham-operated rats underwent the same surgical procedure, with adipose tissue transplanted instead of endometrial tissue. Ectopic lesion establishment, progression, histopathological changes, and pain-related behavioral responses were subsequently evaluated.
Figure 1. Histopathological validation of the rat endometriosis (EMT) model by H&E staining.

Gross examination confirmed the successful establishment of ectopic endometrial lesions, which presented as typical cyst-like structures with visible vascularization at Day 28 after transplantation. Histological evaluation by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining further confirmed the presence of ectopic endometrial tissues, characterized by preserved epithelial components, glandular structures, stromal proliferation, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Compared with sham animals, model animals exhibited well-developed ectopic lesions with characteristic endometrial morphology, confirming the successful establishment of the rat endometriosis model. Continuous estradiol stimulation further maintained lesion development and induced more pronounced histopathological alterations.
(A) Histopathological scores of ectopic lesions evaluated based on epithelial integrity, glandular/cystic structure formation, stromal hyperplasia, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05. (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of ectopic lesions from the Sham, EMT Model, and EMT + Estradiol Model groups. No obvious ectopic endometrial structures were observed in the Sham group. The EMT Model group developed typical ectopic endometrial lesions, whereas continuous estradiol stimulation further maintained lesion development and induced more pronounced histopathological alterations in the EMT + Estradiol Model group. Blue arrowheads indicate the monolayer endometrial epithelium; green arrowheads indicate endometrial glands; yellow arrowheads indicate fibrotic regions; red arrowheads indicate stromal cells; black arrowheads indicate inflammatory cell infiltration; asterisks (*) indicate the uterine lumen. H&E stain; scale bars = 2.5mm or 50 μm.
Figure 2. Representative photograph of the Von Frey assay for assessing mechanical hypersensitivity in the rat endometriosis model.

To evaluate endometriosis-associated pain, multiple behavioral assays were incorporated.Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed using Von Frey filament testing, including evaluation of lesion-associated abdominal pain and peripheral hypersensitivity.Thermal nociception was evaluated using the tail-flick assay to assess heat sensitivity changes during disease progression.The model showed reproducible pain-related phenotypes, including increased mechanical sensitivity and altered thermal pain responses after model induction.
(A) Mechanical sensitivity of ectopic lesions evaluated using the Von Frey filament test on Days 22 and 28. Each point represents the average of 5 measurements taken by an animal. (B) Mechanical withdrawal threshold of the hind paw measured using the Von Frey filament test on Days 7, 14, 21, 22, and 28. Each point represents the average of 5 measurements taken by an animal. (C) Thermal nociceptive sensitivity assessed using the tail-flick test on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Each point represents the average of 3 measurements taken by an animal. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 3. Estradiol promotes ectopic lesion development in the rat endometriosis model.

In addition to behavioral assessment, molecular characterization was performed to evaluate pain-related mechanisms.TRPV1 expression analysis in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) demonstrated activation of pain-associated neuronal pathways, supporting the involvement of peripheral sensitization in the model.Combined behavioral and molecular evidence indicates that the rat endometriosis model successfully recapitulates key features of endometriosis-associated pain.
(A) Quantitative analysis of ectopic lesion fluorescence at Day 28. Stable ectopic lesions were detected in the EMT Model group, while estradiol treatment showed a trend toward increasing the fluorescence-positive area and the proportion of positive signals. (B) Representative fluorescence images of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Green fluorescence indicates TRPV1-positive signals, and blue fluorescence indicates cell nuclei (DAPI). Compared with the EMT Model group, the EMT + Estradiol Model group showed a trend toward increased fluorescence intensity and lesion expansion; However, the differences were not statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Discover related models and services to accelerate your research


This website will store cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with this website and enable us to remember you. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, as well as to analyze and collect relevant data and metrics about visitors on this website and other platforms. For more information about the cookies we use, please refer to our privacy policy
If you decline, your information will not be tracked when visiting this website. A cookie will be used in your browser to remember your preference settings that you have not accepted.
Let us know which event you're attending and we'd be happy to connect with you.
