
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) restore anti-tumor immunity by blocking inhibitory signals—such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4—that tumors exploit to evade immune surveillance. Maximizing therapeutic impact increasingly requires pairing checkpoint blockade with immune co-stimulatory agonists to drive a more potent, durable anti-tumor response.
Selecting the appropriate humanized mouse platform and tumor model—based on target pathway, immune microenvironment, and expected mechanism of action—is essential for generating clinically relevant readouts of efficacy and synergy.
A central challenge in preclinical immuno-oncology research is the species specificity of antibody-target interactions: antibodies developed to recognize human epitopes typically fail to bind their murine counterparts due to interspecies sequence and structural divergence. Given the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint modulators and the species-specific considerations inherent to biologic drug development, humanized animal models provide a more robust foundation for nonclinical evaluation. GemPharmatech offers two complementary systems: target-humanized models and human immune system (HIS) reconstitution models.
Target-Humanized Models
Using transgenic and gene-editing approaches, endogenous murine immune checkpoint genes in BALB/c and C57BL/6 backgrounds are replaced with their human counterparts. These models retain a fully functional murine immune system capable of mounting native anti-tumor responses, while enabling evaluation of human-specific therapeutics. They serve as a strong platform for both efficacy characterization and early safety assessment of immune checkpoint-targeted agents.
Human Immune System (HIS) Reconstitution Models
By engrafting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) into severely immunodeficient NCG and next-generation NCG mice, a reconstituted functional human immune environment can closely mimic human immunophysiology.
PBMC-Based Models characterized by rapid and efficient engraftment, these models enable fast-track pharmacological studies. HSC-Based Models offer significantly extended survival and durable immune engraftment. Incorporating human cytokine transgenes that support hematopoietic development into the immunodeficient host background enables HSCs to differentiate into a broader spectrum of human immune cell subsets beyond T and B lymphocytes—including myeloid and innate lineages.
GemPharmatech's Integrated Preclinical Evaluation Platform
GemPharmatech offers a comprehensive portfolio of immune checkpoint evaluation models, encompassing both gene-humanized and immune reconstitution platforms, thereby delivering a broader range of choices for pre-clinical in vivo efficacy assessment of PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies.
Humanized Immune System Models

Figure 1. Anti-mPD1 demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition in both the B6 mouse model inoculated with MC38 (A) and the BALB/c mouse model inoculated with CT26 (B) tumor cells. (A) C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with murine MC38 colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of anti-mPD-1 at 1 mg/kg twice a week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 20. N = 6 mice in each group. (B) BALB/c mice were inoculated with murine CT26 colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of anti-mPD-1 at 10 mg/kg twice a week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 20. N = 6 mice per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. A two‑way ANOVA was used, and Šídák's post hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons between each treatment group and the G1 control at endpoint. ***p<0.001
Syngeneic tumor models capture key features of the tumor immune microenvironment, supporting in vivo mechanistic studies of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. These models also serve as a robust platform for efficacy assessment, enabling both mechanistic investigation and exploration of combination therapeutic strategies.


Figure 2. In vivo efficacy evaluation of test articles targeting hPD-1 or hPD-L1. (A) C57BL/6-hPD1 mice were inoculated with murine MC38 colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Keytruda or Opdivo at 3 mg/kg twice a week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 25. N = 10 mice in each group. (B) BALB/c-hPD1 mice were inoculated with murine CT26.WT colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Keytruda at 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg once per three days for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 23. N = 10 mice in each group. (C) C57BL/6-hPD1/hPDL1 mice were inoculated with murine MC38-hPDL1 colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Keytruda and Tecentriq at 3 mg/kg once per three days for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 23. N = 8 mice in each group. (D) BALB/c-hPD1/hPDL1 mice were inoculated with murine CT26-hPDL1 colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Keytruda and Tecentriq at 10 mg/kg once per three days for a total of 3 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 9. N = 8 mice in each group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. A two‑way ANOVA was used, and Tukey's post hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons between each treatment group and the G1 control at endpoint. ***p<0.001
Keytruda, Opdivo, and Tecentriq demonstrated significant anti-tumor effect on C57BL/6J background target humanized mice (B6-hPD1, B6-hPD1/hPDL1) and BALB/c background target humanized mice (BALB/c-hPD1, BALB/c-hPD1/hPDL1). Target-humanized mice provide a reliable in vivo model with strong translational responsiveness to therapeutics targeting human PD-1/PD-L1.

Figure 3. In vivo efficacy evaluation of test articles targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in human immune cell reconstituted mice bearing CDX tumors. (A) NCG mice were co-inoculated with a LS174T and PBMC admix subcutaneously, followed by i.p. administration of Opdivo at 10 mg/kg once per three days for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 18. N = 6 mice in each group. (B) PBMC reconstituted NCG mice were inoculated with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Tecentriq at 10 mg/kg twice per week for a total of 8 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 38. N = 6 mice in each group. (C) PBMC reconstitution NCG mice were inoculated with RKO colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Tecentriq at 10 mg/kg twice per week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 25. N = 6 mice in each group. (D) HSC reconstitution NCG-IL15 mice were inoculated with HCC827 lung cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Tecentriq at 10 mg/kg twice per week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 23. N = 5 mice in each group. (E) HSC reconstitution NCG-IL15 mice were inoculated with NCI-H1975 lung cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Anti-PDL1 antibody at 10 mg/kg twice per week for a total of 6 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 23. N = 7 mice in each group. (F) HSC reconstitution NCG-IL15 mice were inoculated with RKO colon cancer, followed by i.p. administration of Tecentriq at 10 mg/kg twice per week for a total of 8 times. Tumor volumes were monitored through Day 33. N = 5 mice in each group.Data are shown as mean ± SEM. A two‑way ANOVA was used, and Šídák's post hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons between each treatment group and the G1 control at endpoint. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001
Preclinical efficacy evaluations were conducted to assess the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1-targeting test agents in humanized immune-reconstituted NCG mice bearing established CDX tumor xenografts. Significant antitumor efficacy was observed for both Opdivo and Tecentriq in PBMC-humanized mice implanted with distinct CDX models, with the therapeutic response exhibiting donor-to-donor variability. In the HSC-NCG-IL15 humanized mouse model, the PD-L1-directed checkpoint inhibitor Tecentriq exhibited robust antitumor responses across different CDX models.

Let us know which event you're attending and we'd be happy to connect with you.